F1 2011 start

Satsearching · 26-03-2011, 09:11 PM

This years first quals are......

1 Vettel
2 Hammy
3 Webber
4 Button
5 Sulkonso

Cracking time from Vettel, not bad for hammy as both had no kers! Don't the teams need to find a way to take advantage of kers?

I think this movable rear wing will cause accidents this season after seeing a few spin offs with bad timing of use.

First main race tomorrow, so, who you guys backing for 2011?

SS

renwich · 26-03-2011, 09:49 PM

Kers is pointless if everyone has it,

Macs are a big supprise to be this competitive after the bad tests so I'll be backing them as my usual team Williams are piss poor again

Satsearching · 26-03-2011, 10:18 PM

Maybe the window of kers gain is too narrow with current rules/restrictions.

The fact that P1 and P2 didn't have kers working proves it. A well developed Kers should have an advantage to promote greener tech to follow on to everyday cars that will promote F1.

But at the moment, I agree, kers is pointless, needs a wider frame to work with to allow it to be an advantage, and constructors to have various different methods to develop for a real gain on the track.

SS

26-03-2011, 09:11 PM	#1 (permalink)
Satsearching Yorkshire Git Admin Team-UkCvs Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Here Posts: 1,569 iTrader: (0) Casino cash: $528632 Thanks: 660 Thanked 1,441 Times in 722 Posts Nominated 11 Times in 4 Posts TOTW/F/M Award(s): 4 Groans: 2 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	F1 2011 start This years first quals are...... 1 Vettel 2 Hammy 3 Webber 4 Button 5 Sulkonso Cracking time from Vettel, not bad for hammy as both had no kers! Don't the teams need to find a way to take advantage of kers? I think this movable rear wing will cause accidents this season after seeing a few spin offs with bad timing of use. First main race tomorrow, so, who you guys backing for 2011? SS __________________ Download Our Toolbar Now !! DBOX HELPFILE HERE Any information provided on this site is not guaranteed in any way. Some articles may discuss topics that are illegal, so this information is provided for educational purposes only, use at your own risk !! NO TO SKY AND F1, BBC WAKE UP! HELLO RTL! Last edited by Satsearching; 26-03-2011 at 09:19 PM..

26-03-2011, 09:49 PM	#2 (permalink)
renwich Northern Git Admin Team-UkCvs Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Posts: 5,098 iTrader: (0) Casino cash: $326774 Thanks: 1,127 Thanked 1,271 Times in 538 Posts Nominated 8 Times in 6 Posts TOTW/F/M Award(s): 4 Groans: 1 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	Kers is pointless if everyone has it, Macs are a big supprise to be this competitive after the bad tests so I'll be backing them as my usual team Williams are piss poor again __________________ Recently robbed of half my Sunday afternoons Passion by a dwarfish twat

26-03-2011, 10:18 PM	#3 (permalink)
Satsearching Yorkshire Git Admin Team-UkCvs Senior Member Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Here Posts: 1,569 iTrader: (0) Casino cash: $528632 Thanks: 660 Thanked 1,441 Times in 722 Posts Nominated 11 Times in 4 Posts TOTW/F/M Award(s): 4 Groans: 2 Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts	Maybe the window of kers gain is too narrow with current rules/restrictions. The fact that P1 and P2 didn't have kers working proves it. A well developed Kers should have an advantage to promote greener tech to follow on to everyday cars that will promote F1. But at the moment, I agree, kers is pointless, needs a wider frame to work with to allow it to be an advantage, and constructors to have various different methods to develop for a real gain on the track. SS __________________ Download Our Toolbar Now !! DBOX HELPFILE HERE Any information provided on this site is not guaranteed in any way. Some articles may discuss topics that are illegal, so this information is provided for educational purposes only, use at your own risk !! NO TO SKY AND F1, BBC WAKE UP! HELLO RTL!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)