![]() |
|
|||
|
|
||||
|
||||||
| General Satellite TV General Satellite TV |
![]() |
|
|
LinkBack | Thread Tools | Display Modes |
|
|
#1 (permalink) |
|
Donated Member
UkCvs Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 83
iTrader: (0)
Casino cash: $39595
Thanks: 37
Thanked 57 Times in 19 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
As the title guys, i'm after a linux receiver with built in positioner to control a actuator motor. This is for a family member who is not that technical so really dont want to go down the route of a dreambox & seperate positioner if it can be avoided.
The dish installed is a big 1.2m channel master which I think is too heavy for a diseqc motor & dont really want to go through the hassle of swapping that either. Let me know whats available please. Thank you in advance. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 (permalink) | |
|
Yorkshire Git Admin
Team-UkCvs Senior Member
Join Date: Aug 2008 ![]() Location: Here
Posts: 1,569
iTrader: (0)
Casino cash: $528632
Thanks: 660
Thanked 1,441 Times in 722 Posts
Nominated 11 Times in 4 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 4Groans: 2
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
Difficult one m8, I am not aware of one (there may be one) but to control a jack arm you are looking at something like a "SuperJack V-Box II". Apparently it can work transparent and automatically convert the disque signals to drive a conventional 36v jack.
TBH everything is going disque these days but 1.2M dish is really on the limit for a disque motor so I appreciate where you are coming from. Do they really need such a big dish though? Going back some years I had a similar sized "John Levick" dish with jack arm etc but satellites these days are more powerfull and 1M here is more than enough for me now. Way up the costs, approx £60 for a SuperJack V-Box II (with complications maybe?), but a new disque motor and 1M dish can be had for the same cost! If a linux box does exist to control a jack arm, how popular is it? Is there a lot of image support? SS Quote:
__________________
![]() Download Our Toolbar Now !! DBOX HELPFILE HERE Any information provided on this site is not guaranteed in any way. Some articles may discuss topics that are illegal, so this information is provided for educational purposes only, use at your own risk !! NO TO SKY AND F1, BBC WAKE UP! HELLO RTL! Last edited by Satsearching; 21-10-2008 at 10:01 PM.. |
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Satsearching For This Useful Post: | Sicilian (22-10-2008) |
|
|
#3 (permalink) |
|
Respected Member
UkCvs Member
Join Date: Sep 2008 ![]() Location: In our house
Posts: 35
iTrader: (0)
Casino cash: $16450
Thanks: 11
Thanked 19 Times in 10 Posts
Nominated 0 Times in 0 Posts
TOTW/F/M Award(s): 0
Groans: 0
Groaned at 0 Times in 0 Posts
|
SS is right sic i`m afraid m8, the older receivers use to have them built in, if i think right.
Most receivers now have the diseqc built in, and i have a 1.2 dish m8 and my motor works fine with it m8. Just if you are going for such a high size dish you are better to get the extended arm on the diseq motor, but you should be ok with one on it. Personaly if your not wanting to go diseqc motor then go for the V-Box but as also mentioned m8 by SS it would probs be better to go diseq motor than v-box as will be cheaper and if you do upgrade then you already have the motor. I know such motors are only supposed to work right with up to 1m but i have had the 1.2 on mine and it worked fine, now i have a 1mtr as there isnt any need now for a 1.2 than when we realy needed them for the D2Mc days
|
|
|
|
| The Following User Says Thank You to Dr-X For This Useful Post: | Sicilian (27-10-2008) |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|